|Peong Wei Jie||1||0||Arjun Babu|
|Nathan Gittens||0||1||Henry Withington|
|Jamie Tilston||1||0||Steve Withington|
|Tobi Okusanyu||1||0||Duncan Chambers|
|Curtis Monkley||0||1||Les Day|
|Mohamed Al Lawati||1||0||Ben Remy|
Nomads C were eager for revenge in this return match. The scoreline belies six very close games, but Uni were to win 4 – 2.
|Nomads B||5-1||Barnsley B|
|Ian Barwick||1-0||K Hunter|
|Geoff Frost||0½-0½||N Todd|
|Arjun Babu||1-0||R F Hall|
|Nick Mahoney||1-0||A Perry|
|Henry Withington||0½-0½||P Lea Kime|
|Steve Withington||1-0||J Stevens|
Standing in as captain for Keith, I was pleased to see what a strong and committed team we had.
First to finish, and playing extremely quickly, was Steve. He won a pawn in the opening and exchanged off to a winning ending where he won a piece.
Second and third to finish were Geoff and Henry. One was a fluid open game and position, one was not…..
Nick wrapped up a win on board 4 with a nice win of Queen, and then mopped up.
So 3-1 everything was fine. Ian had a slight plus in a Q and double rook ending but there were no obvious weaknesses in either position. arjun had his usual complex position and naturally no time. So when he contrived to get his Q trapped and lose it for a Rook, I feared the worst. There was compensation in that he had 2 connected passed pawns on the 5th and two excellent bishops. There was then a flurry of exchanges which left Richard with a Rook and Knight trying to stop the 2 pawns supported by the bishops. It was only going to end one way.
Finally Ian was quietly going about his business. He gave up his passed Q side pawn in exchange for tempi to storm Ken’s King. A nice culmination of a good game by Ian.
|Eric Mckenna (b)||0||1||A Steele|
|Robert Shaw||0||1||A Taylor|
|Jo Woollard||1||0||M Charlton|
|Ashley Rogers||1||0||M Anderson|
Robert opened poorly, and was mated on move 14. Eric had a promising start, but was eventually outplayed. Unfortunately, I didn’t get a good look at Ashley’s game, but he seemed to win without major problems.
Jo reached the end game with two rooks, the bishop pair, and six pawns against a knight, bishop, and five pawns, a clear advantage. She marched her b pawn up the board, but her opponent resigned just as she was about to queen it.
Usually chess evenings end with a mad scramble. However, on this match day it began with a mad scramble as one of my players went AWOL and several others either didn’t respond to requests to play or had already made arrangements for the evening. I had even emailed James to inform him we were likely to be short a player when Nick responded to my pleas with a ‘I think I might be able to make it’ message… good enough for me and in he came on eight as the board order from the first match all shuffled up to 3-7. Dr Hempson was missing from the Ecclesall line up as well, so on paper the teams looked very evenly matched. Over the board… it was a similar story. I think this is the first match I can recall when 6 boards were still in action at 9.45pm; over half the games were still in progress at a point when the Ecclesall C – Nomads C match had concluded which should give a good idea of how tight this was.
So the first to finish was the last to sign up – Nick and Ken drawing a drawish game after agreeing a draw. I didn’t see much of this game so I can’t really offer much beyond that! Second to finish (as is regular tradition) was Geoff – only this time it wasn’t a draw as regular Ecclesall opponent Gunnar lost material to a tactic and was unable to recover with the position blasted open. I followed (not so close) behind – it’s not often you move your king twice in the first 12 moves and don’t lose in a miniature but after missing a tactic in the opening I was in trouble for the majority of the game with Farshad maintaining a pawn+ advantage for some time. However, my early centralised king proved to be a little bit of a thorn in his plans in the later middlegame and I was able to hang on and eventually win the pawn back to reach a completely drawn ending. Ian, on the other hand, was a pawn up in his endgame against James but was on the receiving end of some active rook play that allowed James to recover his pawn deficit and offer a draw. We had the advantage with four games still ongoing, all of which featured Nomads players in varying degrees of time trouble ranging from Chris (whose flag seemingly hung for a good 20 minutes) to Arjun (who was actually not too far behind on the clock for once but making heavy weather of a position in which he had declined a draw offer).
It was actually Jon that finished next – he had all the activity against David’s kingside and it looked for all the world like he would break through – winning the exchange still wasn’t enough for the full point though as a combination of David’s dogged resistance and a ticking clock meant Jon wasn’t able to find a way to win. 3 – 2. Mike had a tremendous advantage against Ewan with two connected, passed pawns on the 6th, mating threats and surely only a matter of time before he sealed the deal. Chris, however, was struggling to stay on the board after Jim’s sacrifice opened up the kingside. Pieces were seemingly scattered across the board, with blocking sacrifices, exchange sacrifices, and some piece positions that I’ve not seen for some time (Knights on h7 and f8, Bishops on g7 and e8). Jim kept his composure and worked his way through the complications to secure a winning advantage and tie the scores. Arjun’s position had deteriorated significantly by now – being a rook down in a queen and rook ending against Alan is not ideal at the best of times and a king/queen fork was enough for him to fall on his sword. From a relatively commanding position, we were now entirely dependent on Mike to secure a share of the spoils; that he had lost both passed pawns and had a hanging flag wasn’t helping matters but his final passer got to the seventh and Ewan had run out of checks – rather than force Mike to play out the win and gamble that his flag might fall, Ewan resigned and the match was tied. Phew. I don’t think I’ve sweated that much in a match (the venue was a little on the warm side, my position was atrocious, and the team keep on giving me heart palpitations) but the end result seemed pretty fair. We had a slight edge in several games, but were also under the cosh in the others – and ultimately this is a point gained on last year when Ecclesall A were the one team to inflict defeat on us.
Onwards to Chesterfield in a couple of weeks… these matches don’t get any easier, do they?
|Ecclesall C||0.5||5.5||Nomads C|
|Bill Egan||0||1||Henry Withington (w)|
|Saeed Hassani||0||1||Steve Withington|
|S Bullington||0||1||Duncan Chambers|
|John Speck||0.5||0.5||Keith Wicks|
|Ken Scott||0||1||Les Day|
|M Howarth||0||1||Eric McKenna|
After being hammered by the University, Nomads C really needed a win and got a convincing one. A familiar line up of regular C team players were on form and unbeaten on all boards.
|Nomads 400||2||2||Ravenfield Bishops|
|Eric Mckenna (b)||1||0||B England|
|Robert Shaw||0||1||D Hill|
|Jo Woollard||0||1||M Wilkes|
|Gordon Shaw||1||0||P Sherman|
Robert and his opponent lost their queens in quick succession. Eventually, his opponent forced material gain with a promotion threat. Robert played on for a while, but eventually resigned.
Eric castled kingside while his opponent developed his queen early. Eric gained material, then exchanged queens, leaving him with two rooks, a bishop, a knight, and six pawns against two rook and five pawns, a decisive material advantage. Mate soon follow.
Gordon soon gained a knight, then swapped down, ending with a queen, two rooks and three pawns against a queen, single rook, and three pawns. Faced with the forced capture of his queen Gordon’s opponent resigned.
Jo and her opponent both castled kingside, swapping off minor pieces and reaching this position on move 36.
The game was looking drawish, but Jo had a few minutes less on the clock so eventually ran out of time.
|H. Withington (W)||0.5||0.5||K. Marshall|
|K. Dewhurst||0||1||D. Watson|
|S. Withington||0.5||0.5||D. Glossop|
|K. Wicks||0||1||B. Williams|
|D. Chambers||1||0||J. Reynolds|
|L. Day||0||1||P. Connolly|
Nomads won the toss and played White on odd boards. We gained an early lead with a win on board 5 but Aughton soon equalised by winning board 6. On board 4, Keith seemed to be doing well in a double-rook ending but the next time I looked he had only one rook and his opponent had two… Steve defended actively to gain a draw in an ending a pawn down. Henry’s game looked unclear to me from the outset and eventually ended in another draw. Last to finish was Ken who ran out of time in an ending the exchange down, making the final score 4-2 to the visitors and leaving Nomads 2 to try our luck in the Plate competition. Thanks to everyone for turning out.
Last season ended with an almighty clash of the titans, as Nomads A and SASCA A collided in our penultimate match; the 4-4 draw (with a couple of dropped 1/2 points from our side at the start and end of the match) ultimately handed the title to SASCA. That hurt – and beating Stannington A in a dead rubber didn’t do anything to assuage the pain. The fixtures secretary sprinkled his magic dust and we got an immediate shot at revenge at the start of this season… but with Sam Milson and Paul Cumbers back in Lincolnshire and Daniel unable to play Tuesdays (and moving to SASCA as a result) the omens did not seem all that good. However… SASCA were shorn of several of their players for the match as well so when we sat down to play the match ups seemed pretty even, with two fixtures (Chris – Ryan, myself – Tom) mirroring that fateful night in April.
It has become a bit of a cliche in my reports over time, but even the most one-eyed of Nomads fans would admit that tonight was absolutely our lucky night. Geoff and I perused the boards some time after 9.00pm, deep into the second hour of the match, and when Geoff asked ‘is anyone from our team winning?’ it was clearly a rhetorical question. Jon seemed to be hanging on by his fingertips against Oskar, Chris didn’t appear any better against Ryan, Jamie’s pawn structure looked like a long term weakness and his clock a medium term one with Yang composed and looking to grind him down, my own position was the usual mess of randomly scattered pieces in an a3 Sicilian and last time that had happened against Tom, he had slipped calmly into a won ending…and won; Ian’s king looked dangerously exposed with Steve’s pieces massing for a kingside attack; Mike and John were sparring lightly in a centre-counter; Geoff was struggling to make headway as Nat’s pawn structure and greater space seemed to give him all the play, and finally Arjun and Marek seemed to be swapping off pieces and heading towards a likely drawish ending.
For the first time I can remember, the first to finish was Chris. To my amateur eye, he seemed to have a slightly better position but nothing significant and a queen and two minor pieces each together with a smattering of pawns looked exceedingly drawish. It was indeed drawn and both teams were off the mark. Geoff’s game finished next and this too ended in a draw though by his own admission it should be chalked up in the ‘fortunate’ section of this report; Nat missing the win of a pawn before accepting a (slightly) hopeful offer of a draw on the very next move. At least we had a point – but SASCA then took the lead when Jamie’s resistance was finally broken. Clinging on somewhat from the late middlegame as his pawn weaknesses began to take their toll, he was unable to get any real piece play as Yang kept things tight and precise to eke out a win and a level of revenge for his defeat to Jamie last season. So we were now 2-1 down – but that was the only time we were behind. A flurry of wins now followed (to the extent that I don’t actually know in what order). Arjun won a piece in a series of exchanges and that was enough; Mike had turned the screw gradually against John’s kingside and something (I didn’t see what) eventually gave and that was also enough; and Ian’s brave defence, including sacrificing the exchange, was sufficiently diverting that Steve was unable to make the time control and that too, was enough. From 2-1 down to 4-2 up pretty much in an instant.
With little hesitation, I snapped off one of Tom’s extra pawns and offered a draw a move later both because I knew that would win us the match, but also because he had a lot less time than me and I felt I could hold the position (note: I had also taken a look at Jon’s game not too long beforehand and it hadn’t looked overly promising). Naturally and logically, Tom declined as he still had an extra pawn and my king might yet be vulnerable to a queen and rook attack so we played on. I thought I’d have another look at Jon’s game and somehow he was a piece and a pawn or two up, ahead on the clock, and clearly winning. Things were looking up! And they went from good to even better – I managed to avoid any tricks and march my king over to the left hand edge of the board where the best Tom could do was check repeatedly with his rook – he thought he could do better but that allowed me to generate my own series of checks followed by a double-edged rook manouevre that both blocked out the dying embers of his attack whilst also creating an unstoppable threat of my own. Tom’s final queenside pawn fell and with it his queen and the match was ours. A minute or two later, Oskar’s defence finally collapsed and Jon, too, sealed a win.
Conclusion: Another fascinating battle between SASCA and Nomads staged with familiar faces, some unfamiliar positions, and ultimately a result that perhaps gives the whole league hope in the face of what on paper looks to be a formidable SASCA side when all their big guns are playing. Next up we travel to Ecclesall and the site of our one defeat last season. Here’s hoping the scent of revenge continues to linger in our nostrils for that one!
|Henry Withington (b)||0½||0½||Roger Baxter|
|Steve Withington||0||1||Tobi Okusanyu|
|Keith Wicks||0||1||Peong Wei Jie|
|Duncan Chambers||0||1||Tjin Hui Hoh|
|Ben Remy||1||0||Mohd Sazlee Hidayatullah|
|Eric McKenna||0||1||Curtis Monkley|
A strong university team demolished Nomads on four boards. Henry was able to get a draw, and last to finish was Ben, who did a Houdini, and turned what looked like a lost endgame into Nomads’ only win of the evening.
|Sasca E||0½||4½||Nomads D|
|D Evans (w)||0||1||Eric McKenna (b)|
|A Wilson||0||1||Robert Shaw|
|M Atkinson||0||1||Jo Woollard|
|J Sexton||0||1||Dave Kesteven|
|W Peck||0½||0½||Ashley Rogers|
Sasca won the toss, and chose white on odds.
Eric castled kingside, with good early development, swapping down to two rooks each, with a pawn advantage. After the rooks went too, both players promoted simultaneously, but then Eric forced a second promotion, and his opponent resigned.
Robert sacrificed a knight on f7 for positional advantage, and came out of the resulting exchanges a minor piece up, eventually ending up with a knight and pawns against a bare king, then sacrificed the knight to allow a quick pawn promotion. His opponent resigned soon after.
Jo won material early on, having a two rook advantage at one point, and delivered mate on move 37, with her queen on her opponent’s first rank, behind his king.
Dave also won material early on, capturing his opponents queen on move 23. Mate quickly followed.
After some initial gains Ashley agreed a draw in a deeply unclear position.
The Sheffield Individual Tournaments
Comprising the Bruce Trophy, Holroyd Trophy &
These will be played as six-round Swiss tournaments spread out over the coming season, with one game scheduled every four to six weeks. In the case of insufficient entries then sections may be combined or a different format may be use
Closing date for entries is Saturday 15th October 2016
Entry Fee: There is no entry fee !!!!
Please send your entry, including
date of birth (Juniors only)
To Geoff Brown:
O17O9 837596; O7931 563787